BLOG ARTICLE
Why Candidates Hate Your Interview Task (And How to Fix It)
Let’s be honest: most interview tasks suck.
They’re long, unclear, unpaid, and often completely irrelevant to the role.
And yet, companies cling to them – convinced they’re the only way to “see how someone thinks.”
The truth? Bad tasks lose great candidates.
Especially in a market where time, transparency, and trust matter more than ever.
Here’s why candidates hate your interview task AND how to make it better.

1. It’s Too Long
If your task takes 2+ hours and you’re not paying for it, you’re asking a stranger to do free work for a job they might not even get. That’s not assessment – it’s exploitation.
It signals a lack of respect for their time.
Fix it:
- Keep take-homes under 90 minutes
- Let them do it async.
- Offer compensation for anything longer or intensive (and mean it)
2. You’re giving the task too early
One of the biggest red flags for candidates is being asked to complete a task before speaking to a single person.
No intro call. No context. No relationship.
Just a test – like they’re being asked to prove they’re worthy of your time.
It doesn’t just feel cold, it feels like a filter. And it sends the message that your process values efficiency over experience.
Fix it:
- Always start with a Talent or HR screening call — even a quick one
- Use that conversation to give context, build rapport, and answer early questions
- Position the task as part of a collaborative process, not a hurdle
Candidates are far more likely to invest effort in a process they feel part of — not one they feel thrown into.
3. It’s Not Role-Relevant
Far too many tasks test generic skills – not the actual job.
If you’re hiring a marketer and asking them to “rebrand the company,” or a product manager to redesign your app from scratch… you’re not assessing. You’re outsourcing strategy.
Fix it:
- Use real problems the role will face
- Focus on how they think, not just what they deliver
- Align the format with the level (e.g. a 15-min teardown might be more telling than a 6-slide deck)
4. There’s No Context
“Please complete the attached task.”
No background, no objectives, no audience. Just an instruction.
When tasks lack context, you’re not testing skills – you’re testing mind-reading.
Fix it:
- Show an example or a model answer (it levels the playing field)
- Give clear instructions
- Tell them who it’s for, what matters, and what you’re looking to learn
5. Feedback? What Feedback?
Most candidates never hear anything after submitting a task. Or worse – they get a rejection with no explanation.
They’ve invested their time, the least you can do is tell them why it didn’t move forward.
Fix it:
- Set expectations upfront: “We’ll share feedback within X days”
- Send a quick summary of what worked / didn’t
- Even better – offer a short call (especially if their output was close)
It’s a small gesture that pays off in long-term brand and referrals.
6. It’s the Only Thing That Matters
When you treat the task like the be-all-end-all, you ignore everything else the candidate brings:
- Their experience
- How they communicate
- Their values, curiosity, and team fit
A bad task can block brilliant people. A good task should support the decision – not make it.
Fix it:
Make sure the task is:
- One part of a well-rounded process
- Framed as an insight tool, not a pass/fail test
- Debriefed in a real conversation – not just “we’ll be in touch”
Final thought
Tasks aren’t the problem. Bad ones are.
Done right, they give candidates a taste of the work, and give you a view into how they think.
Done wrong, they create frustration, dropouts, and bad Glassdoor reviews.
Your task should reflect how you operate as a company.
Clear. Respectful. Worth doing.
If it doesn’t… maybe it’s not the candidate that needs improving.
Need help improving your hiring journey?
Let’s talk about how we can reduce your time to hire and increase your offer acceptance rates – while delivering a candidate experience that sets you apart.
Leave a Reply